NatureWorks Ingeo 3D850 PLA Filament


In this short article, we’ll cover some fundamentals about PLA filament manufacturing and NatureWorks’ 3D850 resin. 3D850 refers to the PLA resin grade used in the production of our Super Premium Series filaments. All our Super Premium Series PLA filaments on offer contain ~98% 3D850 PLA resin with up to 2% of 3052D resin as a pigment carrier. Since PLA filaments are quickly becoming the most popular 3D printing material on the market, we wanted to discuss why our materials outperform the competition. PLA’s popularity stems from the fact that it’s easy to print, doesn’t create any bad odours and is environmentally friendly. However, generic PLA formulations are not without drawbacks, and we’ll do our best to explain the essential differences. In general, PLA formulations found in the marketplace exhibit low heat distortion temperatures, high coefficient of friction and low melt flow index. These attributes translate into rigid and more delicate 3D printed parts that are harder to extrude and can easily fracture. To overcome some of these PLA issues and improve 3D printing performance, NatureWorks took its years of experience in the polymer manufacturing business and formulated the Ingeo 3D850 PLA resin. We’re taking the lead by offering this premium resin to our customers.

Introduction to the PLA Manufacturing Process

First, let’s start by discussing the chemical process NatureWorks uses to create the Ingeo line of PLA resins. The initial step in this process involves harvesting corn and extracting its starch through a wet-milling process. Suitable starches are also harvested from other agricultural sources such as sugarcane. However, corn being a common starch source in North America it’s used most of the time.

3D850 Super Premium Series 3D Printer Filament - Manufacturing Process 1

The next step in the process involves heating the starch with enzymes to hydrolyze it into dextrose (D-glucose). Once the dextrose is formed through hydrolysis, the material is harvested and subjected to microorganisms in a fermentation vat to convert it into lactic acid. This lactic acid is then refined through a two-step (or more) process that forms rings of lactide. It’s these lactide rings that open up and polymerise to form long chains of polylactic acid (PLA).

3D850 Super Premium Series 3D Printer Filament - Manufacturing Process 2

The last manufacturing step forms PLA into pellets that are later used to extrude 3D printer filament. As shown below, it’s important to note that the entire process as implemented at Natureworks has a very low carbon emission when compared to other material creation processes.

3D850 Super Premium Series 3D Printer Filament - Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Performance Enhancements - 3D850 PLA

Now let’s look at the characteristics that NatureWorks has enhanced in its line of 3D850 PLA resin. The first thing to notice is that 3D850’s melt flow index is higher than that of standard PLA or ABS. In the material properties table shown below, we present typical values associated with ABS and PLA from a renowned Chinese manufacturer (ESUN) and compare them to 3D850’s properties. First, we see that the melt flow index of ABS and PLA filament from China is reported as 1.5 g/10 min and 7.8 g/10 min, as compared to 9 g/10 min for 3D850. A high melt flow index is often indicative of a lower coefficient of friction. This high melt flow index thus yields an advantage because extruder motors have to do less work to extrude the same length of filament (print faster). Also, a higher melt flow index leads to a cooler extruder operating temperatures and less wear on parts. Another advantage is a lowered probability of extruder gear slippage or stripping of the filament when back pressure occurs in the hot end.

3D850 Super Premium Series 3D Printer Filament - Comparison

When looking at a broader range of 3D printer filaments, it’s typical to see that materials with high impact resistances have conversely low tensile strengths (or vice-versa). The chart shown below (my3dmatter) illustrates how different filaments compare when looking at their tensile strength and impact resistance. We can see that a trade-off between tensile strength and impact resistance is apparent, and it’s rare to see filaments that exhibit both properties at the same time. From this particular study, it was noticed that some manufacturers similar to NatureWorks have hybrid materials that fall outside the norm for most 3D printer filaments. Special filaments (such as Super Premium Series) exhibit both high tensile strength and high impact resistance. We’ve added Super Premium on the chart below to show how well it performs in both Tensile Strength and Impact Resistance (top right quadrant).

3D850 Super Premium Series 3D Printer Filament - Chart

Next, let’s take a closer look at 3D850’s flexural modulus (i.e. the materials tendency to bend under stress). 3D850’s value is 4357 MPa as compared to ABS at 1948 MPa and PLA at 2504 MPa. Also, the flexural modulus value for 3D850 is even higher than Taulman 3D’s In-PLA which comes in at 1971.9 MPa (285.99 psi) as shown below.

Taulman's In-PLA Specs

So what does having a high flexural modulus mean for 3D printing? Printing structures that are long and thin will have less deflection or bend under pressure, thus eliminating the need for supports or thick rafts.

One of the biggest issues with PLA is its low heat deflection temperature or heat distortion temperature also known as HDT. HDT is the temperature at which a polymer or plastic will deform under pressure. Historically, when printing parts requiring high resistance to temperature, ABS was the best material. Nowadays, 3D850’s HDT is a whopping 144°C which means it will suffer minute deformation (if any) below that temperature. When compared to typical ABS and PLA having HDT values of 85°C and 50°C respectively, heat resistance is much improved.

From a usage perspective, filaments made with 3D850 resin feature other enhancements such as excellent bonding with print surfaces, a feature that is significantly improving first layer quality and minimizing the risk of warping. Next, shrinkage of parts during and after printing is also non-existent and virtually no odor is present during extrusion.


Because NatureWorks Ingeo 3D850 has taken on the best characteristics of various materials such as high heat resistance and high tensile strength, PLA will no longer have limitations in certain markets and industries. With improvements in materials technology and better processing techniques, Boots Industries delivers a Super Premium Series filament that surpasses most 3D printer filaments currently available. Ultimately, 3D850 shows that the trade-off between tensile strength for impact resistance can be avoided to yield high impact and high tensile strength PLA parts. Our Super Premium Series PLA filament are designed to offer tough and heat resistant parts analogous to ABS, but without any of the disadvantages.

Super Premium Series

Heat Beds in 3D Printing – Advantages and Equipment

Why use a heat bed?

Heat beds are used because they dramatically improve print quality by keeping the extruded plastic warm and thus preventing warping. Warping is a common condition caused by plastic on the edges of the part cooling down at an uneven rate when compared to the plastic inside of the part. The result is that corners warp up and deform your model.

Rafts are an effective ”no-heat bed” strategy to deal with warping when a heat bed is not available.

In the past, techniques such as the raft (building parts on top of a ‘raft’ of material which is larger than the final part onto the build surface) were used to prevent warping by increasing the surface area of the part (and increasing it’s adhesion – thus fighting warping).


Derived from the raft, mouse ears are a clever and effective technique to make sure that the corners of your prints are well secured to the platform and won’t lift. Although they offer greater adhesion by increasing the surface area for your part to grip onto the bed, they are not 100% effective without a heat bed. Sometimes the warping forces are simply too great and can overcome the mouse ears.

Heat beds work to prevent this warping effect by keeping your part warm during the whole printing process which keeps the material at or above heat-deflection temperature (the temperature at which it is malleable). Keeping the parts in the heat-deflection range ensures that the part remains flat on the print bed. Heat beds, in combination with other tools to increase adhesion, will be covered in this article to bolster your ability to fight unwanted effects and improve your printing quality.

The following video shows what happens with no heat bed and no adhesive added to the glass. It depicts what can typically happen when printing on a non-sticky platform with no heat bed – Disaster!

No heat bed, print stuck to the extruder. Disaster!
No heat bed, print stuck to the extruder. Disaster!
No adhesive used; dramatic result and wasted PLA!
No adhesive used; a dramatic result and wasted PLA!
There are several types of heat beds & heating elements. We specifically discuss the PCB heat bed, the polyamide film heater (kapton film heater) and the aluminium clad heater. You can find a more exhaustive list of heater types here.


Types of heat bed

Regardless of the heat bed you are using, you should generally use these temperatures (heat deflection points) for PLA and ABS:

PLA 50-60°C
ABS 100-110°C

PCB Heat Bed


The MK2A heat bed (200mm x 200mm) is  a good example of a PCB heat bed. These heat beds are used by many 3D printers and our own (Rostock V1.0) due to their great performance and affordability. This particular heat bed has 2 integrated LEDs and an integrated resistor which makes it rather ‘plug and play’ when compared to other solutions.

You can generally expect a simple & clean implementation with these heat beds thanks to the 5 holes available for leveling and installation purposes. They require little vertical clearance when compared to a stainless steel sheet mounted with aluminium clad resistors and offer an even heat distribution. The cons is that they can be slow to heat up especially when used with another surface such as a glass pane.

Kapton (Polyamide) film heater


Kapton or polyamide is well know as a tape of choice for print surfaces, because of its heat resistance, smooth finish and high adhesion for PLA. Now think about two films of polyamide with a heating element sandwiched in between, now you have a polyamide film heater. Obviously, these are very thin, easy to install with an adhesive back, reliable and heat really fast. They have an integrated thermistor and are provided, unlike the PCB heat bed, in an unlimited variety of shapes. For these reasons, this is the type of heater foil we use on our latest 3D printer (BI V2.0).

Aluminium clad heaters


This type of heaters is both very efficient and inexpensive, but they require more installation steps than the last two heat source we’ve discussed. As a matter of fact, they need to be screwed onto a surface, normally a stainless steel or aluminium plate. Then, the electrical circuit needs to be completed with a thermistor and an insulator if you have any temperature sensible elements under the print bed. Finally, it’s also a good idea to use thermal paste between the clad heater and the surface to be heated.

Surface to use with heat beds


All the heat sources mentioned in this article will typically need an added surface to preserve the quality & integrity of the heating element over time or to provide protection in the event of a hotend collision. Obviously, the aluminium clad heaters are always used in conjunction with a surface.

The recommended print surface to be used with a PCB or Polymide film heater is a borosilicate glass, or when unavailable, a tempered glass. For the PCB heat bed, we recommend layering Kapton tape or using a thin glass (2 mm) over-top.

Painter's tape & Kapton tape


In addition to a heat bed surface, most  users will experience that some form of adhesive or method is required to make PLA or ABS stick properly. This is where Kapton tape, painter’s tape, glue or hairspray comes into play.

Painter’s tape is an ideal product for printing ABS with a heat bed because of it’s textured surface increasing adhesion. We’ve used it with varying degrees of success and others report great results as well.

As far as PLA is concerned, our experience is that it doesn’t stick well to heated painter’s tape and that painter’s tape itself doesn’t stick well to the glass when heated. However, we found that PLA sticks very well to Kapton tape which is typically layered to cover the entire print area. The Kapton tape needs to be periodically replaced and this process can be tedious. To remove this obstacle, you can buy Kapton tape in wider rolls which means you need to layer a lesser amount of strips onto the print area to fully cover it.

Hairsprays & Glues


Glues are frequently used to make sure your print “sticks” to the print surface. The most common glue we have seen is the typical arts and craft glue stick (Elmers). This technique works well with ABS in conjunction with painter’s tape.

In the PLA department, we prefer to use hairspray on a glass surface. The glass surface is really flat and produces a really smooth finish for our parts. Another advantage of hairspray is that it can be applied in a few seconds and will typically create a thin film that strips away with the printed part or is easily scraped with a wood chisel or similar tool. Sometimes we use a wet rag to remove hairspray residue from the underside of parts when it’s not desired for aesthetic reasons.

What we recommend

We recommend the PCB heat bed or Polyamide film heater in conjunction with a glass surface. For PLA we always apply a thin coating of hairspray and so far this simple combination has been producing great results.

The Importance of High Quality 3D Printer Filament


3D printing filament is the ink used by your 3D printer and its importance cannot be underestimated when aiming for top-quality results. In this article, we’ll share some of our insights on the plastic filament used for 3D printing. We’ll help you better understand why our Super Premium Series filament is so effective and what to look for when buying plastic for your own printer.

There are many types of filament available and we’ve sold several of them at Boots Industries over the years; however, we’ve recently elected to specialize in PLA filaments. Our decision was based on several factors, but the most compelling reasons for us were the fact that PLA (Polylactic acid) is manufactured from renewable sources and is not harmful to your health or the environment when printed parts are discarded. As the 3D printing industry grows, manufacturers, suppliers and retailers must take on a leadership role in providing eco-friendly and sustainable products. In addition, with advances in thermoplastic technology, we’re now able to offer PLA blends that have print characteristics that are very close to those of ABS, without any of the disadvantages

Our 3D printer manufacturing background gives us extensive experience with several 3D printing materials, but most of the examples in this article are based on PLA. That being said, our analysis is in most cases applicable to other types of plastics used for 3D printing and with which we have extensive experience (i.e. Nylon, PC, HIPS, PVA, PET, Conductive, Filled, Synthetic Rubber etc.).

First of all, both PLA and ABS are great materials for 3D printing applications and you can make amazing things with both. To begin this article, we’ve compiled a list of important characteristics for both these plastics.

Why are we specializing in PLA?

  • PLA (short for Polylactic acid) is a plastic made of renewable starches, such as corn and sugarcane.
  • It is biodegradable and does not emit noticeable amounts of ultra-fines particles (UFCs).
  • It produces a barely noticeable smell when extruding.
  • Depending on the specifications and the color, extrusion temperatures can vary between 190 and 230 °C.
  • Parts printed using PLA are more rigid than ABS parts.
  • In general, parts printed using PLA have a slightly glossy finish.
  • PLA is less prone to warping during the printing process and is much ‘stickier’ than ABS.
  • Regular PLA starts to become malleable (heat deflection point) at around 60 °C.
  • PLA is a modern material in the history of FDM 3D printers and has a promising future.

Som facts about ABS - The legacy 3D printing material

  • ABS (short for acrylonitrile butadiene styrene) is a common thermoplastic that is essentially petroleum-based.
  • ABS can be purchased at a slightly lower price than PLA, due to its petroleum-based origin and higher availability.
  • It is a documented fact that ABS produces UFCs when printing. Good ventilation is recommended.
  • It produces a ‘burnt plastic’ smell when extruding.
  • Depending on the specifications and the color, the extrusion temperature can vary between 220 and 260 °C.
  • Parts printed using ABS have a “bend” to them and are less brittle than PLA.
  • In general, parts printed using ABS have a glossier finish than PLA parts.
  • ABS starts to become malleable (heat deflection point) at around 100 °C (which still makes it less heat resistant than our Super Premium Series PLA formulation).
  • ABS has a lower coefficient of friction than PLA and requires slightly less force to be extruded than PLA.
  • ABS can be considered the “legacy” filament, as it was used for 3D printing before PLA.
  • Fun fact: The world-renowned Lego blocks are made from injection-molded ABS plastic!

Why is 1.75 mm better?

  • As the filament is lighter per unit of length, the extruder motor displaces less mass.
  • Displacing less mass allows designers to create more compact extruders.
  • Filament with a smaller diameter can be heated faster (as it takes less time for the heat to reach the center), so you can print faster.
  • The faster heating characteristic allows for more compact hot end block designs.
  • The smaller nozzles allow for a more precise plastic flow control and reduce the risk of oozing.
  • Being smaller, the filament is also more flexible and can be coiled more tightly and turn sharper corners.
  • Force required by the extruder to push the plastic in the extruder is lowered because less pressure builds up in the nozzle.

Now that we’ve discussed the reasons behind our affinity for 1.75 mm PLA filament, let’s explain what to look for in a good 3D printing filament. Some considerations are more obvious than others, but some small details are easily overlooked unless you have a lot of experience 3D printing. This article discusses the most important factors so that you can make an informed decision when purchasing filament for your 3D printer.

Diameter Tolerance

When printing using any type of FFF 3D printer, it’s important to understand that the software controlling the printer calculates the extrusion volume based on the filament diameter, the diameter of your extruder nozzle, and the extrusion speed (commonly referred to as flow rate – in mm/s). In essence, your 3D printer controls the volume of plastic that is pushed out of the nozzle by turning the extruder wheel and pushing a certain length of filament down the hot end. If you have a filament with an irregular diameter, the volume of extruded plastic varies and the software can’t and won’t adjust the extrusion length to compensate for this diameter variation. Instead, it will keep on printing, expecting a certain ‘theoretical’ amount of plastic to come out. This problem, caused by poor diameter tolerance, is what we refer to as ‘inconsistent extrusion’.


Ideally, your filament should maintain an absolutely constant diameter across the entire spool. However, in real life, due to small imperfections in the manufacturing process, there is always a tolerance within which the diameter will be maintained. The tolerance of a filament describes the variation in diameter that is present in the filament you use. For example, at Boots Industries, our 1.75 mm filament features a diameter tolerance of ± 0.05 mm. This is an excellent tolerance that and is achieved by using four-axis laser gauges and other advanced manufacturing technologies.


Serious issues can arise from an inconsistent filament diameter. A typical example is extruder failure, a condition where the extruder fails and no plastic makes it to the hot end. This can occur if your filament suddenly becomes too thin for the extruder tensioning mechanism, which leads to insufficient pressure gripping the filament. Another effect of a decrease in filament diameter is that back-flow could occur in the hot end (hindering plastic delivery to the head).

The other extreme is when your filament’s diameter is suddenly too wide and the extruder motor is not strong enough to push it through or it does not fit into the hot end opening. Another effect of an increase in diameter is that the extruder gear could shred the surface of the plastic, leaving nothing to grip and stalling your extruder.


In all cases, extruder problems of this nature can be mitigated by a tensioning mechanism that applies and maintains the tension dynamically on the filament, regardless of its diameter, by using a spring. However, not all extruder tensioners have this feature and will not guard you against gross diameter deviations.

Typically, when looking at filament tolerance, the gold standard across the industry is 0.05 mm. Working extensively with many extrusion lines and partners, we’ve found that it’s very hard to go lower than that and maintain consistency across the full length of a spool. When you purchase a new spool, you can use a micrometer to measure the diameter at several places and ensure that it meets the advertised tolerance.

Filament Roundness

When making contact with the extruder wheel, the filament will always suffer some compression due to the extruder wheel gripping the plastic. This will, in fact, reduce the roundness of the filament, but is also consistent across the entire spool, so it will not really affect print quality.

That being said, the consistency of filament roundness across the entire length of the spool is still important. This is because filament that suddenly loses its perfect round shape and becomes oval-shaped can lead to extruder failure in the same way that increasing or decreasing the filament diameter does.

Spool Dimensions

Spool form factor is a highly debated topic across the 3D printing world. Several standards currently exist and different parties consistently attempt to standardize spool dimensions. The key dimensions in any spool are the flange diameter, the mounting diameter, the inner coil diameter and the width of the spool. These dimensions can affect the mounting compatibility of your filament since certain 3D printer manufacturers attempt to lock consumers into purchasing only their filament by creating enclosed mounting systems that can only receive a single spool form factor (almost like a key hole). Others have gone so far as to include technological protection measures (TPMs), such as chips and bar codes, to further restrict your choices.


If you are buying filament, it’s because you intend to use it all and chances are you’ll be looking for the best quality at a reasonable price. We’ve tried filament from many different suppliers and came across many different types of spools. We found that some spool designs actually compromise the usability of the material. When using spools where the inner coil diameter is relatively small (< 80 mm), we found that the tightly wound plastic becomes harder to unspool. The temperature of the plastic can affect this when it is spooled by the manufacturer; good manufacturers ensure that the plastic is cooled before winding it onto to the spool to minimize shape-memory deformation.

Nonetheless, it’s important to remember that most extruder designs require the extruder to pull the filament off the spool. As such, when you reach the end of a tightly coiled spool where the plastic retained the shape of the coil, the filament becomes harder to unspool and the extruder gear can start to slip and/or strip your filament.

This situation can usually be avoided by increasing the extruder tension, but with too much tension, the roundness of the filament can start to become compromised and the slightest variation may overpower the extruder’s power rating.

To maintain a constant setup and minimize extruder strain, we recommend a spool with an inner coil diameter greater than 80 mm. Of course, you don’t want to have a spool with an inner coil diameter that is too large, as it is more expensive to ship and store. Each supplier has its own design policy aimed at optimizing cost and spool volume, but spool inner coil diameter is of utmost interest when considering plastic filament purchases for 3D printing.


Filament Storage

If you are going to purchase high-quality filament and properly calibrate your machine for a high-quality result, filament storage is as important. The problem with most plastics (regardless of quality) is that over time they absorb moisture, which creates small water bubbles in the filament itself. These small bubbles, when heated at the tip of your extruder, reach the boiling point and explode violently. This dramatically reduces the quality of your prints, as the plastic is spewed out randomly, instead of being carefully laid down. At Boots Industries, we recommend two simple strategies to store your 3D printing filament and avoid the accumulation of moisture. You can store individual filament spools in a sealed Ziploc bag with a small silica gel desiccant pouch (all our spools ship vacuum-sealed with a desiccant pouch and we include a Ziploc bag). For bulk storage, one technique is to use plastic bins and a bucket of uncooked rice as a natural desiccant. This is very effective for keeping the filament bone dry and is also quite accessible and inexpensive.

Filament Packaging

Filament is susceptible to the environment and should always be shipped in sealed packaging with desiccant. Great manufacturers go to extreme lengths to produce filament in a highly controlled environment and won’t spare any expense to preserve its integrity during shipping. We offer best-in-class vacuum-sealed protection for all spools we ship, including a humidity indicator to ensure that the product arrives in perfect condition.

PLA Filament Grade

PLA filament is manufactured from PLA pellets, which come from various producers and have many applications outside of 3D printing. NatureWorks is the foremost producer of PLA in the world, but many other companies in the Netherlands and in China also manufacture it. When purchasing PLA filament for 3D printing, it’s very important to buy from a supplier with extensive 3D-printing experience. The main reason is that many PLA filaments are extruded from PLA pellets that are not designed for 3D printing. A lot of PLAs is manufactured specifically to create food packaging, cups and other items that are not manufactured through an extrusion process (i.e. injection molding, film and sheet casting, spinning etc.). These PLA blends are not designed to be reheated and extruded for a third time (i.e. 3D printed). These generic PLA variants often work for 3D printing, but are far from optimal for this application. The resulting materials are hard to extrude, warp, have low adhesion and have low heat deflection points. At Boots Industries, we use the very best PLA formulation, Ingeo 3D850, which is specifically designed for 3D printers and produced by NatureWorks in the United States. All our filament blends use 100% new PLA pellets (no recycled materials) that have only undergone one melting cycle (when extruding it into 1.75 mm filament). Most competitors use lower quality blends, such as 4043D, 2003D and perhaps even cheaper alternatives.

This is a very important factor in 3D printer filament, which is why we only sell products that are 100% made in North America with top-quality materials. We strongly advise against filaments made in China, which are increasingly flooding the market.


We’ve discussed some important parameters to consider when buying plastic filament for 3D printing. We hope to have successfully demonstrated our understanding of 3D printing materials and convinced you that our PLA filaments are designed to meet the highest quality standards. Our Super Premium Series PLA was formulated to be the best filament for 3D printing:

  • Sourced from corn in a sustainable way and 100% biodegradable
  • Super Premium Series PLA has a heat deflection point of 144 °C!
  • Excellent adhesion characteristics
  • Sharp melting behavior for accurate extrusion profiles
  • Excellent material stability – virtually no warping
  • Does not require a heat bed
  • Very low emissions and no odor
  • Post-annealing in the range of 80-130°C can be used to promote crystallization and improve the heat deflection temperature of the 3D printed part.

We hope you’ve enjoyed our article and will consider trying our world-class materials, but should you choose to purchase from another source, we recommend following these simple rules:

  1. Only buy filament where a tolerance is advertised (0.05 mm and lower seems to be the gold standard).
  2. Only buy filament that features excellent roundness (usually this comes with excellent tolerance as well).
  3. If the spool used has a very small inner coil diameter, beware of material usability issues. We recommend spools with an inner coil greater than 80 mm.
  4. Only buy filament that is properly packaged to protect its properties.
  5. Make sure that the person selling the filament has experience with 3D printing. Some people are only re-sellers and don’t fully understand or test their product. Take the time to ask the sellers questions and do not settle for vague or incomplete answers.

3D Printer Buying Guide


Just a few years ago, 3D printing objects seemed to be a sci-fi fantasy reserved only for high end prototyping labs. Nowadays, printing everyday objects in the home is a reality that is bringing ever more performance and affordability to the consumer.

Since the 90’s, the 3D printing concept started evolving and picking up speed to finally reach a stage where the public began to be introduced to these machines. With the participation of RepRap and DIY communities, the development of 3D printers for the home quickly evolved to the point where the market is presenting a very large selection of machines to the prospective buyer.

When we think about 3D printing, the first images that come to mind are the almost instantaneous creation of objects with ease. However, the technology isn’t quite yet like the Star Trek replicator where light is transformed into delicious meals and other useful objects. Our goal is to help you distinguish science fiction from reality and make an informed decision.

star trek replicator

What do you really know about 3D printing? Are you thinking about purchasing a first 3D printer for the home? Follow our buying guide and learn how to avoid traps and where to look to be entirely satisfied with your purchase!

The 3D Printer

To 3D print from the comfort of your home you need a machine, but which one is right for you?

First and foremost, you must determine how you plan to use the 3D printer to best maximize your investment. Several parameters must be considered:

  • Build volume
  • Resolution
  • Print speed
  • Material compatibility
  • Multiple material capabilities
  • Control and Connectivity

Build Volume

Build volume is one of the most important consideration when purchasing a 3D printer. It’s also generally directly tied to the pricing of the 3D printer (larger being more expensive). Think about the size of the parts you plan to print and that most 3D printed models are often made of several smaller parts assembled you print them. You may not require the largest build volume out there!

BI Recommends: At least 150 mm X 150 mm X 150 mm of build volume. We feel that anything lower would severely restrict the potential of your 3D printer.


Resolution typically refers to the Z minimal layer thickness and X-Y resolution that can be achieved by the 3D printer. Since motion systems have been around for a very long time, the X-Y resolution is usually quite good for any 3D printer. Since all FDM/FFF 3D printers create parts with a layering effect, the finish quality of printed parts is directly affected by layer thickness resolution. The thinner the layers are on a given part the smoother the part finish will look, but it will also take longer to print. Some 3D printers often report minimum layer thickness as low as 50 micron (0.05 mm). However, printing parts with thin layers requires careful software calibration since the margin for error is reduced. Most users will prefer to print parts with layer thickness of 0.10 mm to 0.30 mm to reduce print time while still retaining an acceptable finish quality.

3d printer buyer guide - resolution

BI Recommends: 3D printers with 50-100 micron minimum layer thickness.

Print Speed

Print speed represents the speed at which the 3D printer creates parts. This parameter is usually reported in mm/second or mm/minute and usually refers to the fastest speed that can be achieved when the print head is dispensing plastic. Another speed metric representing movement speed (when print head is not dispensing) is usually offered. It’s important to understand that during a 3D print the average print speed will actually be lower than the maximum reported print speed. It is so because the print head has to slow down when changing direction or printing finer details. As a rule of thumb it’s best to use ¾ of the maximal print speed to obtain a more realistic estimation of the print speed (i.e. reported 100 mm/s would yield a true print speed closer to 75 mm/s).

3D Printer buying guide - speed1

BI Recommends: 3D printers with print speeds of at least 75 mm/second for a feel good experience when printing parts.

Material Compatibility

Material compatibility is an important factor to consider, because some 3D printers are only tailored for specific materials. More recently, several 3D printer manufacturers chose to only support PLA in order to simplify the print process and their business model. If you have an interest in printing various materials, make sure that the 3D printer you select supports these materials. A parameter to look for is the maximal extrusion temperature or, in other words, how warm the hotend can be heated. Some specialized filament such as flexible filament require specifically designed extruders for best results. If you plan to use the 3D printer for small projects and fun, a PLA only unit is likely to satisfy your needs. For more professional uses, look for a multi-material capable unit.

3D Printer buying guide - materials1

BI Recommends: 3D printer with a hotend capable of printing up to 250 °C to allow for bot PLA and ABS prints.

Multiple Material Capabilities

Multiple material capabilities allow you to print with multiple colors and materials simultaneously, or to easily switch between various filament options. These options are available on many 3D printers, but typically require a deeper understanding of the printing process to be successfully carried out. Some 3D printers offer robust software that greatly simplify multi-material printing. This will be an area of added value to look for when looking for the right 3D printer.

3D Printer buying guide - multiple materials1

BI Recommends: Consider your specific needs and ask questions to the manufacturer before purchasing the 3D printer.

Control and Connectivity

Control and Connectivity refers to the software packages included with the 3D printer to control it. Most of the time the 3D printer is controlled via a desktop control software such as Repetier Host and MatterControl. Increasingly, control can be done remotely by means of print servers, mobile apps and Wi-Fi or Bluetooth enabled machines. Most 3D printers will require a physical USB connection from a computer hosting the control and slicing software. A lot of 3D printer also offer control via SD card where the G-code is preloaded and run directly on the 3D printer control board. We favor this control method, because it prevents any problem with the control computer (i.e. going into sleep, crash, anti-virus slowing things down, etc).

3D Printer buying guide - Control1

One last thing to consider is that simple software/hardware kits such as PrintToPeer can be used to enable Wi-Fi control of any 3D printer through your smartphone, tablet or even outside of the house using any browser. The ability to start, monitor and receive 3D print notifications wirelessly is tremendous so we recommend the latter to everyone.
3D Printer buying guide - Wifi control

BI Recommends: Get a 3D printer with a well-established control software and if it does not include the wireless control option make sure to get PrinToPeer.

Modelling of the 3D Parts

To launch a 3D print, you typically require an STL file which describes a 3D object with a multidimensional array of triangulated surfaces. The STL is the file that will be “sliced”, a term coined to describe the process by which the G-code (machine instructions) are prepared from a 3D model to be printed.

3D Printer buying guide - STL files

You can find a multitude of STL files online on websites such as Thingiverse and YouMagine. With the growing number of 3D printer adopters it’s now easier than ever to find free models to populate your “to print” list or inspire your designs.

Besides finding ready to go STL files, you can always design your own 3D models and export them in STL. This method is slightly more complex as you will require CAD knowledge to successfully create your model. There exist several free tools to help you design 3D files. Some of the most popular ones are Sketchup and Tinkercad. More professional users will use paid commercial CAD software ranging from a few hundred dollars to a few thousands (i.e. Solidworks).

3D Printer buying guide - Modelling

Finally, you can also obtain an STL file by scanning an object using a 3D scanner. This technique has been increasingly featured by several 3D printing companies, but some limitations are still present (especially in low end systems). Most 3D scanning systems will feature a turn table, a light source (laser), a camera and the associated software and tools to derive potent STL files from the scans. Some 3D printer designers are also including these scanners into their machines to enable “scanning/printing” dynamics.

3D Printer buying guide - 3D Scanning

Once you have the STL file representing the desired object, you will need to “slice” it using a software tailored to the parameters of your specific 3D printer, the “slicer”.

The Slicing process – Generating G-code

This is the last step before sending your file to the 3D printer. This is where your STL file is analyzed and converted to X, Y and Z motions along with extruder commands.

The slicing software will take into consideration the geometry of your 3D printer (i.e. Cartesian vs Delta vs Polar, etc.), the speed limitations, the material cooling time and many other factors to generate a very long file of machine instructions that your 3D printer will execute until the part is complete. A large majority of 3D printers on the market operate on the open-loop concept where no positional feedback is provided to the motion controller. The G-code is thus analogous to a “record” being played by the “record player – motion controller”, the “music” being the part information. If a perturbation is introduced, most printers will not recover and continue playing the “music – G-code” until it is finished.

Most 3D printers on the market will come with a software dedicated for slicing. The latter is configured to take into account the particularities of the hardware to optimize the output quality.

Several software companies specialize in the slicing process and there is an active online community discussing the merits, optimal configurations of each options. Some of the most popular slicing engines that are not proprietary include Slic3r and Cura.

The slicing engine is usually included within the 3D printer control software and allows the user to control slicing options seamlessly behind a graphical user interface.

Once your G-code is ready you need to make sure that your 3D printer is calibrated, ready and loaded with the appropriate 3D printer filament (PLA, ABS, or specialized filaments).

3D Printer Filament

Choose the color you want! In most cases 3D printers utilize 1Kg rolls of filament that are available in various colors and material types.

Let’s a make a quick analogy – When talking about 2D printers, the capacity of an ink cartridge is typically reported in number of pages. For the 3D printer, you’ll need to think about it in terms of weight of the object to be printed. Most control software feature G-code analyzing algorithms that can help you estimate the weight of an object before printing it.

The quantity of plastic required per part also depends on the desired “infill” of the part (how much plastic will fill the hidden voids of the part. Typical parts will have between 10 and 20% of infill plastic, but parts where added rigidity and strength are required may go much higher.

3D Printer buying guide - Infill

The best technique is to print a copy of the desired part, weight it and divide the weight of filament on your roll by it.


3D printing for the home is something that a lot of people are considering, but with an ever increasing selection surrounded by deceiving marketing it can be hard to know what to look for. Our intent is to provide you with the relevant information so that you can be better equipped when you decide to purchase your first 3D printer.

As such, this 3D printer buying guide was designed to provide a quick read of the most relevant points to consider when thinking about purchasing your first 3D printer.

Please contact us if you find any discrepancies or if you would like to see more information added to this article.

Carbon3D – Terminator Inspired 3D Printing Technology

Technology Breakthrough

The Carbon3D startup recently presented a prototype exploiting a new approach using resin, light, and oxygen to accelerate conventional DLP/SLA 3D printing at a TED conference in Vancouver.

3D printing advances and lower pricing now allows us to dream about ideas and quickly create parts in the comfort of our homes. Despite its usefulness, 3D printing technology still has many sticking points for the professional user and is unsuited for large scale manufacturing. Shortfalls such as long print times and layering effects – to name only two – are holding the technology back. But things are moving forward with the latest announcement from Carbon3D.

Carbon3D, a Redwood City, Calif.-based company recently unveiled their prototype 3D printer using an innovation capable of producing parts 25 to 100 times faster than current DLP/SLA processes. They innovate in this field by introducing an oxygen permeable window (oxygen can go through) at the base of the resin vessel. This permeable glass allows for the creation of a thin layer of oxygen – dead zone – between the resin and the glass surface. Since oxygen inhibits the polymerization of the resin, it means that parts no longer stick to the bottom of the vessel, thus allowing the creation of objects in continuous mode. This new technique named CLIP (Continuous Liquid Interface Production) has the potential to bridge the gap between 3D printing and injection molding manufacturing.

CLIP Process - From Presentation
As explained in their prototype presentation the so-called “Traditional Mechanical Approach” of DLP/SLA has four steps which have now been replaced by a single continuous exposition step. This is how the company plans to develop machines that would not only print faster but as Dr. Joseph Desimone (Carbon3D CEO and Co-Founder) points out, create parts that are “molecularly smooth” akin to injection molded parts. Carbon3D uses and develops sophisticated software to control the oxygen content and the thickness of the dead zone based on the print speed (photon flux) and the resin material used.

Traditional Approach - From Presentation

Insert videoFor those interested in reviewing the process with greater scientific rigor, the technique has recently been featured in the latest edition of Science (accessible in full with free registration). The article discusses the dead zone thickness parameters and test results in greater details. In addition and as expected, the article highlights that a trade-off still exists between print speeds and parts resolutions. In a video, Carbon3D shows how the popular 3D printable model of an Eiffel tower emerges from the resin vessel in less than 7 minutes.

Some have criticized the new technique as “not revolutionary” and “more of the same”, but with more than $41 million raised in venture capital from both Sequoia Capital and Silver Lake Kraftwerk the company is well on its way to perfect CLIP and introduce high-speed additive manufacturing technologies that could disrupt fulfill the true promise of 3D printing.

3D Printers: Technology Rundown


3D printing also known as additive manufacturing (AM) is a process of making three-dimensional objects through an additive process in which successive layers of material are laid atop one another to form a desired shape. AM can be traced back to the 1980s when the first forms of AM equipment and process came to life such as Chuck Hull’s stereolithography printer. Since the start, more process and technology improvements have surfaced and can be categorized into 7 distinct types:

  1. Material Extrusion
  2. Light Photopolymerization
  3. Material Jetting
  4. Binder Jetting
  5. Powder Bed Fusion
  6. Direct Energy Deposition
  7. Sheet Lamination

Material Extrusion

Material extrusion’s technology referred to as Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) but also dubbed Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) for legal reasons has been a popular choice for the DIY/hobbyist community and was invented in the late 80s by Scott Crump. The FDM/FFF process starts with software to determine how the filament extruder(s) will draw out each layer to build up the model, preparing it for the building process. Printers with two or more print heads can print out multiple colors and/or use scaffolding materials to support the overhanging parts of complex prints. In either case, FDM printers use only one print head at a time, switching between them for multi-material prints.

The actual printing process works by using a motor to feed the filament through a heating element. The filament emerges molten and quickly hardens to bond with the layer below it. The print head and/or the build platform moves in the X-Y (horizontal) plane before moving in the Z-axis (vertically) once each layer is complete. In this way, the object is built one layer at a time from the bottom upwards. Keep in mind that, while FDM is a very flexible printing process, it can have trouble printing sharp angles and overhangs. Choosing an efficient orientation for the model on the printing bed can make a big difference. If the object was printed using support material or rafts, after the printing process is complete, they are snapped off or dissolved in solvent leaving behind the finished object. Post-processing steps can greatly improve the surface. Acetone baths can be used leave the part with a glossy shine, similar to cast molding.

FDM/FFF printers can be categorized into 3 designs; Cartesian, Delta and polar. Cartesian style move the build platform in the X and Y coordinate and Z is accomplished by raising the Z carriage. Deltas, such as in the Boots Industries BI V2.5 have a stationary build platform but instead use 3 towers rotated 120 degrees from each other and lifts and lowers each towers attached carriage to achieve movement about the X, Y and Z coordinates. The last is a polar design is which the build platform moves in the Z axis while the extruder moves about the polar coordinate system r and φ. Material selection is growing weekly but typical forms include Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and Polylactic acid (PLA).

FDM/FFF Cartesian 3D Printer

FDM/FFF Delta 3D Printer

FDM/FFF Polar 3D Printer

Light Photopolymerization

Light Photopolymerization can be divided into 2 technologies, Stereolithography (SLA/SL) and Digital Light Processing (DLP). SLA/SL works by using a laser to draw each layer of a model into a UV curable resin (photopolymer). Exposure to the UV light causes the liquid resin to solidify and attach to the layer below. SLA can have slower build speeds compared with Digital Light Processing (DLP) because each layer must be drawn out by the laser beam as opposed to DLP’s process with which a single layer is created by projecting an entire image. Depending on machine manufacturer, designs can vary drastically.  Machines like the Form1 by Formlabs, directs the laser with a galvanometer while machines such as Old World Laboratories Nano keep the laser perpendicular to the print surface similar to FDM/FFF printers hotend. Varying designs are also adopted concerning the build plate and the printed objects can be lifted or submerged from the vat. For Digital Light Processing (DLP) a digital micromirror device (DMD) is the core component. The DMD projects a light pattern of each cross-sectional slice of the object through an imaging lens and onto the photopolymer resin. The projected light causes the resin to harden and form the corresponding layer which fuses it to the adjacent layer of the model. Compared with SLA/SL, DLP can have relatively faster build speeds. This is because a single layer is created in one digital image, as opposed to SLA’s laser process which must scan the vat with a single point.  The B9Creator was one of the first projector based printers to hit to market. Just like FDM/FFF objects with steep angles and overhangs will require support structures.

Now unlike FDM/FFF, finished prints tend to not have distinct visible layers. Post-processing typically entails washing away excess resin and cutting or sanding supports. Support removal is usually carried out after the model has had time to fully cure. Curing time can be shortened by setting the object under a UV lamp. Current materials are limited and pricey but mimic ABS, polypropylene, and wax. When comparing FDM/FFF printers with photopolymerization printers, photopolymerization gives higher resolution prints but at a cost significantly higher than FDM/FFF. Photopolymerization is also limited to single color printing.

Material Jetting

Material Jetting machines have close resemblances to traditional paper printers. In Material Jetting a photopolymer material is funneled into a liquid stream which is jetted out of the printhead onto the build tray. A UV light surrounding the printhead cures each successive layer immediately. With material being jetted on demand, multi-material prints are possible. The advantages of multi-material prints are multi-color prints and also prints with superior mechanical properties when creating “plastic alloys”.  As in the other technologies listed above, support material is required. Machines that fall into this category are very high resolution down to about 20 microns but priced significantly higher than the any of the above technologies.

SLA/SL 3D Printer

DLP 3D Printer

Binder Jetting

Binder Jetting also called Drop-on-powder or Inkjet Powder Printing was developed in 1993 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). It works by using an automated piston fed roller to spread a layer of densely backed powder onto the build platform. A printhead then applies a binder to form a cross section of the object. The process is repeated until the object is complete. Unlike the previous technologies, binder jetting can have full color prints. Full color printing is accomplished using a process similar to paper inkjet printing. Once the binder is laid down, the inkjet print-head follows and deposits color where required. Support structures are rarely needed as each slice is supported by the previous layer(s) of powder. Post-processing work is required which entails blowing excess powder with pressurized air. The leftover material blown from the object during post-processing is reusable.  Materials can range in properties from smooth to porous to rigid or elastic. The major disadvantage to this process is poor mechanical properties but can be overcome by infusing the object with additional materials. With the ability to print large full color objects, binder jetting is favored by the architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) industry.

Binder Jetting 3D Printer

Powder Bed Fusion

Powder Bed Fusion can be subdivided into Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS), Electron Beam Melting (EBM), Selective Heat Sintering (SHS), Selective Laser Melting (SLM) and Selective Laser Sintering (SLS).

Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) was developed by EOS, a German-based company in the 90’s. DMLS and SLS are often used interchangeably but a distinction is made by the fact that DMLS refers specifically to metal sintering and is not used with plastics. The process starts with an automated roller spreading a thin metal layer of powder onto a bed encapsulated in a chamber of inert gas (argon or nitrogen). Gas is used in mitigating the effects of oxidation as sintering occurs. The powder bed must be held at an optimal temperature for sintering to occur. A laser starts to move across the powder, sintering a cross section of the object. This process is then repeated. Like with Binder Jetting, support material is rarely required as the un-sintered powder beneath the active layer acts as support. The left over material can be recycled for future use. Since DMLS takes place at such high temperatures the parts produced are almost free from distortion and residual stress at the micro level, but are subject to thermal stress or warping as cooling occurs. Resolutions can get as little as 20 microns.

Electron Beam Melting (EBM) was developed by Arcam, a Sweden-based company in 1997. EBM starts with a bed of metal powder enclosed in a vacuum chamber in order to reduce the damaging effects of oxidation as melting takes place. An automated roller then spreads a thin layer of metal powder across a bed that is kept at optimal temperature for melting to occur. An electromagnetically controlled electron beam then starts to move across the powder melting a cross section of the object. When the layer is finished the bed drops down and the process is repeated. When printing is completed, the model and excess material is left to cool. All leftover material can be recycled. Finished objects produced will have the same properties as objects created using DMLS.

Selective Heat Sintering (SHS) is manufactured exclusively by Blueprinter, a Denmark-based company. The process starts by an automated roller spreading a thin layer of powder across an encapsulated temperature optimized bed. A printhead then moves across the bed applying heat to bring the powder to just below its melting point causing solidification to occur. The bed is lowered and followed by a piston spreading a new layer of powder which is followed by another pass of the thermal printhead. The process is repeated until object is printed. As with other powder bed printers, the excess material cradles the object in the printing process eliminating the need for supports. After printing is completed very little post-processing is required except removing excess powder. The excess powder is reusable in future prints. SHS’s downfall is its small build volume and limited material selection.

Selective Laser Melting (SLM) was developed in 1995 when Fraunhofer Institute for Laser Technology researchers Dr. Dieter Schwarze and Dr. Matthias Fockele teamed up with F&S Stereolithographietechnik GmbH researchers Dr. Wilhelm Meiners and Dr. Konrad Wissenbach. SLM is a metal additive manufacturing technique similar toSelective Laser Sintering (SLS). The main difference being that SLS sinters the material (heating to just below melting point), while SLM melts the material, creating a melt pool in which material is consolidated before cooling to form a solid structure. The process takes place on a bed of powder enclosed in a chamber of inert gas (argon or nitrogen) in order to reduce the effects of oxidation. The powder bed is held at an optimized temperature for melting. During printing, a thin layer of powder is spread across the build chamber by an automated roller. The laser starts to move across the powder and melts a cross section of the object. A new layer of powder is then spread over the top of the previous layer and the laser then begins to form the next layer. In rare occasions is support structures required as the excess powder cradles the object in the printing process. Once the process is complete the object is left to cool and the leftover material is recovered and recycled for future use. Objects created using SLM are ideal for applications where high strength or high temperatures are required as it results in extremely dense and strong parts. The high temperature required in SLM can cause residual stresses formed from the high thermal gradients within the material.

Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) was developed in the mid-1980s by Dr. Carl Deckard and Dr. Joe Beaman at the University of Texas at Austin. SLS starts with a controlled chamber encapsulating a heated bed of powder (just below melting point) producing ideal conditions for sintering. A thin layer of powder is spread across the bed by an automated roller. A laser starts to move across the chamber and sinters a cross section of the object. Since finished part density depends on laser power, rather than laser duration, typical SLS machines use pulsed lasers. The bed drops and another layer of powder is added followed by a pass of the laser. The process is repeated forming completed object. Once complete the object and unsintered material is left to cool followed by material recovery and recycling. As with all powder bed technologies the unsintered powder cradles the object during printing eliminating the need for supports. Materials range from polymers to metals and depending on materials, finished products can resemble that of object produced in conventional manufacturing.

DMLS 3D Printer

EBM 3D Printer

SHS 3D Printer

SLM 3D Printer

SLS 3D Printer

Direct Energy Deposition

Direct Energy Deposition can be broken down into Electron Beam Direct Manufacturing (EBDM)/Electron Beam Freeform Fabrication (EBF3) and Laser Powder Forming (LPF). Electron Beam Direct Manufacturing (EBDM)/Electron Beam Freeform Fabrication (EBF3) are basically the same process, but developed by different people. With the EBDM/EBF3 process, a computer controlled electron beam gun provides the energy source used for melting metallic material, typically in wire form. The highly efficient electron beam can be both precisely focused and deflected using electromagnetic coils. The deposition mechanism deposits the material just where it is needed, solidifying immediately to form a layer of the object. The sequence is repeated to produce a near-net-shape part needing only finish machining. A contamination-free work zone is produced since the process is conducted within a high vacuum environment, which does not require the use of additional inert gasses that are commonly used with laser and arc based processes. EBDM/EBF3 currently has one of the largest build capacities of any 3D printing process.

Laser Powder Forming (LPF) nicknamed Direct Metal Deposition (DMD) is an additive manufacturing technology used to repair and rebuild worn or damaged components, to manufacture new components, and to apply wear and corrosion resistant coatings. A high power laser is used as an energy source to melt a highly focused metallic powder stream onto the melt pool via a powder feeding system which is all performed in a sealed chamber to reduce oxidation. The laser head is controlled by a multi axis joint and the object is built upon a rotary build platform, allowing a variety of angles to produce complex geometries. Depending on the machine used, objects can be near net shape requiring minimal post-processing. A negative aspect of LPF is that the machinery is big and expensive, but also that it requires large amounts of power. This process can use a wide variety of materials such as nickel, iron, cobalt and titanium based alloys, as well as refractory metals and cermets (ceramic-metal composites). Objects produced can have as good or better mechanical properties than cast or wrought objects.

EBDM/EBF3 3D Printer

LPF 3D Printer

Sheet Lamination

The last type is Sheet Lamination which is categorized into Laminated Object Manufacturing (LOM) and UltraSonic Additive Manufacturing (UAM). Laminated Object Manufacturing (LOM) was developed and patented in 1996 by Helisys Inc (now Cubic Technologies) a California based company. LOM works by laying a sheet of material down followed by a glue mechanism that deposits varying amount of glue depending if the area is part of the object or outside it’s bound. A hot compression plate follows ensuring tight bonding between layers. The next step depends on the printers’ ability to print with full color, but a print head similar to that on a standard ink-jet printer would print the required colored outline before the sheet is laid down for bonding.   After bonding and coloring is complete a knife or laser follows, tracing the 2d outline of the model’s cross section. The build plate lowers and the process is started over. Post-processing entails peeling or removing excess material. LOM is slightly less accurate then SLA and SLS but considerably less expensive. While not as prevalent as other methods of additive manufacturing, LOM is starting to get traction thanks to the Architectural sector. The most common materials are plastic and paper sheets.

UltraSonic Additive Manufacturing (UAM) also known as Ultrasonic Consolidation (UC) was developed and patented by Dawn White. UAM is similar in process as LOM; In the fact it’s a hybrid process that combines additive and subtractive manufacturing. Thin strips of metal are laid down side to side followed by a welding process that’s composed of ultrasonic energy delivered at a high-frequency (20,000 Hertz) and the compressive force generated by heavy machine rollers. The welding process is followed by a CNC mill to remove the excess strips of material. These steps are repeated to form the finished object. Selectively applying the strips of metal where material is needed results in significant waste reduction compared with traditional subtractive manufacturing. UAM’s ability to create objects with multiple metal selections with tight bonds makes it ideal for high-value end-use components. Advantages of using UAM over traditional manufacturing are that more complex internal structures are possible and UAM parts will exhibit better mechanical properties. Current material selection includes copper, nickel, silver and stainless steel.

LOM 3D Printer

UAM 3D Printer


As with any technology, new and better techniques are developed constantly and 3D printing is no exception. A few 3D printing technologies that are still in their infancy are High-Speed Sintering (HSS), Voxel Printing/Voxel Assembly and bio printing just to name a few. Even current technologies and processes are changing at a rapid pace. With such a great movement happening in the 3D printing space its future is bright.

Airtripper’s Bowden Extruder – Rostock 3D Printer BI

As part of our work for the construction of the Rostock 3D Printer BI Edition, we modified Airtripper’s original extruder. Our initial goal was to reduce the complexity of the extruder while maintaining the same functionality.

Our efforts were initially focused on replacing the idler/tensionner body strut with a printed part that would support it just as well.



After playing around with the design and testing the extruder, we ended up including other modifications:

Motor Shaft Support

We removed the motor shaft support since we did not have a miniature ball bearing on hand. After several hours of printing we haven’t experienced any problems with the removal of this part so we decided to leave it out of our final design. However, we would caution that a sufficient infill is required in order for this piece to be strong enough (we recommend > 40% infill).

Filament guide tunnel

We slightly elongated the filament guide tunnel. With Airtripper’s original version, we sometimes found that the filament would curve and fall outside of the effective gripping zone (between the bearing and the 5mm insert). Elongating the filament guide tunnel meant that the filament would remain straighter and eliminate these types of problem.

Embedded nuts

When the extruder is installed on the Rostock BI frame, there is little clearance to manipulate the nuts. As such, while trying to install them, it wasn’t uncommon for them to be dropped.  To solve this problem, we decided to embed the nuts and it worked nicely since we could press them into place and manipulate the extruder without having to worry about it.


Teflon Tube Adaptor

Finally, we decided to add a tube adaptor for a 4 mm outside diameter (OD) teflon tube.  This addition proved useful since we were trying tubing that had different ODs during the development stage of Rostock BI.


We would like to thank Airtripper for his original design. All the Sketchup models and .stl file for the BI edition can be found on Thingiverse.

Improvements between BI V2.0 and V2.5


After our very successful Kickstarter campaign for the BI V2.0 3D printer we immediately decided to re-invest and vastly improve the proposed design. The number of upgrades and improvement was such that the new machines would be versioned as BI V2.5 to reflect these advances.

In this article, we aim to document the major improvements between the BI V2.0 and the new BI V2.5. As V2.5 is being finalized this article will be kept current and updated with the latest pictures and information.

Structural Improvements

The original V2.0 featured ¾ inch hollow aluminium extrusions and 3D printed structural corners that required a metal insert to reach the desired rigidity. Hollow aluminium extrusions where selected for their low cost and their ability to conceal electrical wiring to create a cleaner look.  3D printing of the structural corners was an interesting approach for small production runs, but was quickly determined to be unsuitable for a burgeoning Kickstarter production run of more than 300 units. Indeed, each corner would take approximately 10 hours to print and there existed four corner variations. With 6 corners per printer, that meant that each V2.0 required more than 60 hours of print time just for the structural frame!


V2.5 now features structural corners that are similar in function, but are molded in a zinc alloy to allow for a reduced production time, improved rigidity and better tolerance. To accommodate the molding process, the corners were modified with thinner walls and an opening on the bottom to install the aluminium structural beam effortlessly. Another major change is that in V2.5 the structural frame now uses the 20/20 aluminium extrusion system. These 20/20 components are widely available and using them simplifies the fastening of structural beams to structural corners. Lastly, to create a more streamlined look, the axis limiting switch was moved from the outside to the inside of the structural frame.


Another area of improvement for V2.5 is the positioning of the bottom structural corners and the print surface support system. In V2.0 we had the structural corners in the upright position lying flat on the ground and 3D printed clips were added to the bottom horizontal aluminium extrusions in order to support the circular print area. A macro adjustment mechanism was included in each 3D printed clips to level the glass pane.


V2.5 saw the inversion of the bottom corners to allow the use of the bottom horizontal aluminium extrusions for supporting the circular print area. In addition, a laser cut acrylic surface is introduced to allow for the fastening of all electronic components underneath the print area and hidden from view. A slightly more sophisticated leveling system is implemented with three screws and dampening springs that provide an additional layer of protection in the event of a head crash against the glass. Dampening inserts are installed under each corner to reduce the effect of vibration and prevent slippage of the unit on its resting surface.


Linear Motion Components Improvements

V2.0 was comprised of three vertical aluminium beams that served the additional purpose of linear motion components. Our novel approach with V2.0 was to 3D print a custom shaped PLA linear bearing that would fit and glide directly along the vertical aluminium extrusions. To prevent any displacement of the carriages (the components sliding up and down) along the axis perpendicular to the circular build area, we introduced the auto-balancing triple pulley cable system. This new approach generated savings by removing the need for expensive linear rails. In addition, the noise generated by the smooth motion of the carriages along the aluminium extrusions was very low. One disadvantage of cable driven systems was their time-consuming installation, which is unsuited for larger production runs.


V2.5 also relies on a custom shaped linear bearing as well as using the vertical aluminium extrusions as motion components. However, in V2.5 the carriages are injection molded in POM (an engineering thermoplastic with very low coefficient of friction) and match the outline of the 20/20 extrusions. Furthermore, an adjustment mechanism is present in each axis to ensure the carriage is conforming perfectly to the 20/20 extrusions. The result is a linear motion system with very little play and as such there is no longer a requirement for the triple pulley system. For this reason, and for ease of manufacturing, V2.5 ship with a classic belt system.


Delta Platform Improvements

V2.0 featured a 3D printed PLA delta platform with a hotend mounting system that relied on an acrylic insert for support and a 3D printed PLA top plate to secure everything in place. This approach worked relatively well, but did not allow for hotend adjustments that are necessary to ensure perfect vertical alignment of the print heads. In addition, the PLA platform was prone to heat deformation over time. Cooling fans were mounted on the periphery of the platform in order to cool both the object being printed and the hotends. The auto-levelling probe was mounted directly in the center of the platform in the same slot as the hotends. This limited the system to a maximum of 2 hotends whilst using an auto-leveling probe. Having such a large print area, it became apparent that the auto-leveling probe was required at all times.


The delta platform in V2.5 addresses the fundamental issues of V2.0. The new system allows vertical hotend adjustments and is also injection molded out of fiberglass reinforced engineering ABS (which improves heat resistance). The major breakthrough with V2.5 is the hotend vertical adjustment system which ensures that all print heads are perfectly aligned for multiple extrusion prints. This system is comprised of laser cut aluminium plates that support the hotends. The vertical adjustment is possible by introducing a rubber O-ring gasket between the hotend and the adjustment point. The compression distance of this gasket is enough to allow for the necessary adjustments between print heads. Other modifications include the addition of accessory mounting points on the periphery of the platform. This is where a fan can be mounted to support dual extrusion cooling. The auto-levelling probe, if present, is also installed in periphery to free the third hotend hole (V2.0 previously mounted the auto-levelling probe in one of the hotend slots).


Extruder Improvements

The V2.0 extruder is largely derived from our previous work on V1.0 which is itself derived from other widely used open source designs. It worked well, but we felt that it could be further refined for V2.5. In V2.0 the extruder was positioned on the top of the delta tower and relied on a fan to prevent heat exchange between the stepper motor shaft and the filament. When heat transfers to a filament that is not moving for an extended period of time it can become soft and lead to stripping, which in turn leads to extruder failure. Using a fan that blows cold air directly onto the filament is an effective strategy to avoid this failure mode. In V2.0, springs were also used to tension a bearing against the extruder driver wheel. These springs provided dampening and accommodated filaments with diameter variations.


V2.5 sees a major improvement in the positioning of the extruder and the removal of the cooling fan from the design. Positioning the extruder inside the frame streamlines the design and frees the top of each delta tower for other accessories such as spool holders. By using high-quality drivers such as the DRV8825 and better stepper motors that are finely tuned for the extruding application, it is possible to reduce stepper motor heat and remove the cooling fan from the equation. Another modification to V2.5 is the use of a self-tensioning injection molded wheel that combines the roles of the springs and the tensioning bearing in one part.


LCD Case Improvements

We’ve always wanted to include a large LCD for standalone control with our 3D printers. In V2.0 we used a full graphic Smart Controller that contains an SD-Card reader, a rotary encoder, and a 128 x 64 dot matrix LCD display. This LCD is enclosed in a relatively unrefined 3D printed PLA enclosure.


With V2.5 we kept the same outstanding LCD controller, but we took the time to redesign the LCD case to a standard that is more in line with our vision. The result is a beautiful 3D printed enclosure with aluminium backing and acrylic front.



The transition between V2.0 and V2.5 is detailed in this article. At Boots Industries we believe in collaboration and sharing with the community. As such, we will continue to update this article with the latest information and publish further articles. Thanks for reading!

Filament Spool Holder

While working on the Rostock 3D Printer BI edition we also tested different types of PLA filament spools. Although most of the spools that we worked with were similar in that they held 1 kg of PLA, they often had different inner diameters. We found that when working with different spools a versatile system was necessary. We designed our filament spool holder to allow for quick switches between different spool types. When 3D printing, it is important to use a high-quality spool holder as it will ensure the smooth unspooling of the filament and will minimize strain on the extruder.

In this article, we will discuss the BI spool holder and its features. Our primary goal was to design a simple filament spool holder that would be versatile but we also wanted it to be stable and allow for smooth unwinding.

Breaking it down

After several rounds of testing our final design is a spool holder that is comprised of three main parts:

1) The spool holder base which supports the assembly.


2) The rotating platform which sits on top of a 608 bearing and allows for smooth unspooling.


3) The spool adaptor which can be modified to fit any type of filament spool.


The main parts are 3D printed using 1.75 mm PLA and a typical infill of ~30%. Additional parts required include a 608 bearing, a 20 mm M4 cap screw, and a flat M4 washer. The following exploded view depicts the assembly:


Central to this design is the ability to quickly switch between adaptors to accommodate spools with different mounting diameter.

If you would like to print your own, all SketchUp models, STL files, and additional instructions are available on Thingiverse.

How to String the BI V1.0 Delta 3D Printer

The BI V1.0 Delta 3D Printer is assembled with a Cable Drive System that can be tricky to install without some pointers. This article will explain how to properly string each tower and will give information on what to look for when completing this task.

1) We start the stringing process with the 3D printed drive pulley installed to the shaft of the stepper motor.

2) While facing the drive pulley as depicted in the picture below, introduce the no stretch cable trough the guide tunnel from left to right.

  • The drive pulley should be positioned in such a way that orients the inner tunnel to bring the wire closer to the motor (while being inserted from left to right).

3) With the free end coming out on the right make an overhand loop knot.

4) Slip the M4 tensioning screw and the M4 washer trough the loop and screw it in the carriage about 3 threads deep.


5) Next, move the carriage to the top of the tower against the endstop switch.

6) Maintain some tension on the wire by holding the carriage with one hand and spin the pulley with the other hand to make it come down.

  • The initial position of the pulley should be turned at least half a turn clockwise from the position where the cable enters the tunnel guide.

The best technique to turn the drive pulley is by spooling the other side of the cable onto the drive pulley to ensure that the cable doesn’t slip on the pulley. Make sure to maintain tension with the carriage or else you’ll end up running out of tensioning room on the screw later on (it won’t screw up enough to tension the assembly).

7) Keep bringing the carriage down until it is at the very bottom.

8) Once that’s done measure the length of cable necessary to start from the pulley with at least half a turn clockwise then go around the idler pulley then back down to the carriage.

9) Once you’ve determined the length of the cable make an overhand loop knot and cut the free end. Now slip the newly made knot over the cable attachment prong.

  • If you made the knot a bit short and you can’t slip the knot on (which is not a bad thing) you can move the carriage to the middle of the tower while making sure to keep the tension in the cable. Unscrew the tensioning screw, slip the knot over the prong and reinstall the screw.

Sting_5 10) The last step is to make sure the cable spools correctly on the pulley. We’ve analyzed the spooling motion and it is crucial that the cable spools without crossing itself to keep the spooling diameter the same throughout the entire length of the carriage motion.

  • Failure to avoid wire crossing could affect print quality! Usually, if the initial turn of the cable around the pulley is stacked right and there’s enough tension in the cable it should spool correctly. If the cable begins crossing over itself, then you need more tension. You can also use the M4 washer as an adjustment to help position the cable.

Test the motion of the carriage and make sure it doesn’t bind at any point along the tower by moving it by hand up and down a few times. You should also make sure during the test that the cable spools itself properly every time.

You have now stringed one tower. Do the same for the others if required. With experience, you should be able to string one tower under 5 minutes.